Psychoanalysis and Feminism
The argument that psychoanalysis describes patriarchy rather than prescribing it.
However it may have been used, psychoanalysis is not a recommendation for a patriarchal society, but an analysis of one.
Mitchell reads Freud not as an enemy of women but as the analyst of how they come to occupy the place a male-dominated order assigns them. Writing against the feminist consensus of her moment, which treated psychoanalysis as an apology for male power, she works through Freud, and later Lacan, Levi-Strauss and Reich, to show that the unconscious is where the rules of kinship and sexual difference are installed and handed on.
For a clinician the value lies in how she treats femininity, the Oedipus complex and castration as an account of a process rather than a verdict on nature. Gender arrives through identification, prohibition and the child's entry into a symbolic order already in place; it is formed in the psyche, not given at birth. That offers a frame for thinking about how patriarchal arrangements are reproduced in a patient's inner world, and for holding gender and identification as questions in the room.
About the author
Juliet Mitchell
Juliet Mitchell is a British psychoanalyst and academic. She is an emeritus professor at the University of Cambridge, where she is a fellow of Jesus College and founded the university's Centre for Gender Studies. Her work brings psychoanalysis and feminism into dialogue, beginning with Psychoanalysis and Feminism (1974), and she has written on hysteria and on the place of siblings in psychological life, in books such as Mad Men and Medusas and Siblings: Sex and Violence.
Details
- 1974
- English
- Verso
- Verso, 1974
- 512
- 9781836740049