The Basic Fault
Regression as something that can be worked with rather than only managed.
The patient says that he feels there is a fault within him, a fault that must be put right. And it is felt to be a fault, not a complex, not a conflict, not a situation.
Michael Balint sets out a theory of a level of the mind that sits below oedipal conflict, a region which he names the basic fault. He locates its origin in a misfit between early need and the environment's provision, a discrepancy that leaves a deficiency rather than a repressed conflict. Because the trouble is structural, ordinary interpretation reaches it poorly; the patient does not experience a complex to be understood but a fault to be put right. From here Balint distinguishes benign regression, which seeks recognition of unmet need, from malignant regression, which presses for gratification and repeats the original harm. He describes two stances toward objects: the ocnophil, who clings, and the philobat, who trusts open spaces over people. He also marks off an area of creation, where the subject works without an external object. For the clinician, the book offers a vocabulary for what falls outside interpretive work and a way to read regression in the consulting room.
About the author
Michael Balint
Michael Balint (1896 to 1970) was a Hungarian-British psychoanalyst trained in the Budapest tradition of Ferenczi before settling in Britain. His work locates the basic fault, a two-person deficit predating oedipal conflict, and distinguishes benign regression, which serves recognition, from malignant regression, which escalates demand. His account of primary love treats the infant's tie to the early environment as the ground of later object relations. He founded the Balint groups, which train general practitioners in the psychological dimension of medicine.
Details
- 1968
- English
- Routledge
- Routledge, 1968
- 216
- 9780415045087